| Author |
Message |
ckosloff
|
|
Post subject: Unmet dependencies in repo [SOLVED]
 Posted: 26.08.2011, 04:21
|
|
Joined: 2011-08-16
Posts: 118
Location: Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
All repo lines added according to manual, including non-free.
Apt-get update from init 3 OK.
Apt-get dist-upgrade yields these errors:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6 : Depends: libc-bin (=2.13-10) but 2.13-18 is installed
libc6-dev : Depends libc6 (=2.13-18) but 2.13.10 is installed
apt-get -f install will not fix errors.
I cannot go forward setting up this machine.
Please help. |
Last edited by ckosloff on 26.08.2011, 14:50; edited 1 time in total
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 11:22
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ckosloff
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 12:31
|
|
Joined: 2011-08-16
Posts: 118
Location: Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 12:43
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ckosloff
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 13:53
|
|
Joined: 2011-08-16
Posts: 118
Location: Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
@slam,
followed instructions verbatim.
Same error.
This is what I see in init 3 (writing from another computer):
Preparing to replace libc6 2.13-10 (using .../libc6_2.13-18_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): data: internal gzip read error: '<fd>: data error'
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess <decompress> returned error exit status 2
dpkg error processing /var/cache/apt/archiveslibc6_2.13-18_amd64.deb (--unpack):
subprocess dpkg.deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2
configured to not write apport reports
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.13-18_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) |
_________________
http://www.flux.org/members.php?id=94
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ckosloff
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 14:40
|
|
Joined: 2011-08-16
Posts: 118
Location: Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
From init 3:
apt-get clean
apt-get autoclean
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade -f
That hosed the damn error!
Later on will switch back to us instead of de.
Is it OK to leave just that one line in debian.list?
Please note that syntax in manual is without the / after debian.
Error?
Thanks! |
_________________
http://www.flux.org/members.php?id=94
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
piper
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Unmet dependencies in repo
Posted: 26.08.2011, 16:27
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 481
Location: cheektowaga, ny
Status: Offline
|
|
|
Quote:
Is it OK to leave just that one line in debian.list?
Yes
Code:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib
Should be used in the US, if you need non-free
Code:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
|
_________________
debian sid | apt-get into it
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ckosloff
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 27.08.2011, 14:43
|
|
Joined: 2011-08-16
Posts: 118
Location: Florida, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DonKult
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: 27.08.2011, 15:57
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 2010-09-02
Posts: 485
Status: Offline
|
|
|
ckosloff wrote:
Have tested it both ways and there seems to be a difference.
No, there is absolutely no difference (beside that you have to type one char more or less to "copy" this line)
You can try it "at home" in your own shell:
Code:
cd /etc # VS.
cd /etc/
|
_________________
MfG. DonKult
"I never make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones." ~ The Doctor
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
