| Author |
Message |
hellraiser
|
|
|
Post subject: Differences/changes between Aptosid and Siduction?
 Posted: 08.01.2012, 10:05
|
|
Joined: 2011-10-16
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
|
|
Hello and a happy year again 
I've learned form distrowatch thata there's a new distro in the great linux family, named siduction, that forked from aptosid.
So, since I'm a very ver very inexperienced/unexpert linux user, coul you please kindly explain the differences between Aptosid and Siduction?
And please, would oyu post a list of such differences/changes?
Whatever, thanks in aticipation :=) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
kelmo
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Differences/changes between Aptosid and Siduction?
Posted: 08.01.2012, 11:32
|
|
Joined: 2010-09-21
Posts: 15
Status: Offline
|
|
I'm not sure what kind of answers you are expecting, and am especially curious why you are posting new questions when 4 days ago you were requesting your forum account deleted - so I guess you could say that I sense troll-like activities.
The technical differences between the two are to the best of my knowledge untold so far - mostly conceptual/behavioural differences separate them at this time. The people behind "siduction" have a strong difference of opinion about the way the people behind "aptosid" conduct themselves in developing and supporting a FOSS distribution, so they decided to copy everything to somewhere else and started moving on with whatever it is that they want to change.
I am not aware of all differences which caused the "siduction" people grief, but transparency of development seemed to pop up every now and then, a willingness for aptosid people to ignore the perceived user-pain caused by breakage of non-free software was another. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
slam
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Differences/changes between Aptosid and Siduction?
Posted: 08.01.2012, 11:41
|
|
Team Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 607
Location: w3
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
